The Civil Transactions Law came to resolve this type of dispute with an explicit text that balances the interest of the party requesting the division and the rest of the partners, as stated in Article 628 of the Civil Transactions Law.
The second paragraph of Article (628) stipulates that a request by one of the partners to sell the property is not binding on the rest of the partners if it is possible to enable the requesting partner to obtain a fair value for his share without resorting to selling the entire property.
The important thing is not just the partner's desire to sell, but rather the extent to which harm has been caused or not.
The system confirmed that it does not obligate partners to sell at auction when the party requesting the division can sell his share for a value no less than if the entire property were sold.
This text prevents the auction sale from being used as a means of exerting pressure on other partners, and makes the sale an exceptional procedure that is only resorted to when other solutions are impossible.
The system granted the remaining partners an important right to avoid the sale, by compensating the party requesting the division for any decrease in the value of their share if it were sold separately.
And thus the system ensures:
The application of this paragraph entails that:
The second paragraph of Article (628) of the Civil Transactions Law is one of the most important texts regulating the division of jointly owned real estate, because it achieves justice and balance between the partners, and because it contains controls that prevent abuse of the right to request division or resorting to forced sale without justification.
Written by: Lawyer Mohammed Mubarak Al-Ghamijan